Friday, January 29, 2010

Gutless Mike Williams

Gutless Mike Williams,

No one is asking you how to dress, or what not to wear, what to eat, not to eat and so forth! Specially, the Muslims are not telling others to re-write other religious books. However, you people are telling Muslims what to do and not to do all of the time! You are doing so while you are hiding behind four walls and bikinis. You do not give us a chance to reply. You are a gutless wonder and people like you have been deliberately inciting others against Muslims based on false and fabricated reasons and grounds.

Today, I rang your station to oppose your deliberate prejudice and bigotry against Muslims. Your producer took my call and she politely told me that she will call me back. At the end of the day she did not. I am sure you know the reason. So I rang back and she won't pick up the phone this time because she knew it was me! Finally, I used other methodology and rang your station. This time she picked up the phone straight away!!

Now she used trickery to avoid the truth. I asked her to pass the message on and she said that she will do so. Whether she passed the message or not, you failed to broadcast my message.

By the way Williams, during the illegal and immoral Israeli invasion of Lebanon you supported that terrorist act of that zionist state and I opposed it in your program. Guess what? The Israeli High court supported me and exposed your idiocy. Please overcome your prejudice and bigotry and find out the truth.

You see, people like you don't mind to rape your mother and daughter for Israel. Look at me, I stand for the truth. No matter how hard it is.

Got that Williams?

Friday, January 8, 2010

Labor Party Leaders and Lawyers Unlawful Behavior

Faruque Ahmed

P.O. Box – 349, Alexandria - 2015

Mobile: 041 091 4118, Email:

Director General
Attorney General's Department of NSW
Parramatta Justice Precinct
160 Marsden St, Parramatta NSW 2124
DX 1227, Sydney NSW 2001
Phone: 02 8688 7777 or 1800 684 449
Fax: 02 8688 7980

Subject: Labor Party Leaders and Lawyers Unlawful Behavior

Dear Sir/Madam

According to the Taxi Industry (Contract Drivers) Contract Determination, the bailor is solely responsible for fuel and wash costs for the taxi. However the Taxi Industry Association (NSW TIA) made an application at the NSW IRC in NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993 to pass the responsibility for fuel and wash costs to bailee drivers.

The NSW Transport Workers Union who is supposed to represent the taxi drivers said during the proceedings via their lawyer, Adam Hatcher, "we reserve the right to oppose at a later date" and the TWU allowed to have passed a change to the Determination by transferring the cost of fuel and wash to those bailee drivers, contrary to Case and Statute Law.

The good CC Connor who heard the matter mentioned above found the opportunity and then he keenly passed the responsibility of gas and wash to the bailee taxi drivers without any compensation whatsoever to them. He did so despite strenuous objections made to him by myself and other drivers.

The net impact is the weaker party in the chain is carrying the burden while taxi bosses and non active plate investors etc. are laughing all the way to the bank contrary to the public and workers interest. Not long after the TWU lawyer Adam Hatcher found a chamber at the higher end of the town and became a Barrister! The then NSW TWU boss (Secretary) Steve Hutchins became the president of the NSW Labor Party and eventually a Senator after gaining the number one or first selection on the Senate ballot paper.

For your kind information I am appending some interesting discussions amongst taxi industry activists below.

I therefore would like to request you to open an investigation on why at the time and even to this day:

1. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer ignored bailee taxi drivers requests?

2. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer compromised bailee taxi drivers welfare and interest?

3. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer conspired to wrongfully manipulate the Granville Strike mentioned above?

4. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer frog marched mock members (from the Granville strike and many of whom confessed the illegalities and wrongful actions to me later) to the NSW IRC mentioned above to misrepresent bailee drivers in general?

5. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer never made any application to oppose the unlawful arrangement of the payment for fuel and wash as they promised to CC Connor in NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993?

6. Did the NSW TWU leaders and lawyer obtain any benefit out of such a compromise?

7. Why did CC Connor allow this ugly and blatant deal to go ahead without any examination?

8. Did CC Connor gain any benefit for his action and inaction in taxi matters in front of him?

9. Why did CC Connor refuse to accept a labor component in his decision?

With thanks

Sincerely Yours

Faruque Ahmed