Labor Party Leaders and Lawyers Unlawful Behavior

Faruque Ahmed

P.O. Box – 349, Alexandria - 2015

Mobile: 041 091 4118, Email: http://au.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=union_faruque@yahoo.com.au

Director General
Attorney General's Department of NSW
Parramatta Justice Precinct
160 Marsden St, Parramatta NSW 2124
DX 1227, Sydney NSW 2001
Phone: 02 8688 7777 or 1800 684 449
Fax: 02 8688 7980
Website: www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au

Subject: Labor Party Leaders and Lawyers Unlawful Behavior

Dear Sir/Madam

According to the Taxi Industry (Contract Drivers) Contract Determination, the bailor is solely responsible for fuel and wash costs for the taxi. However the Taxi Industry Association (NSW TIA) made an application at the NSW IRC in NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993 to pass the responsibility for fuel and wash costs to bailee drivers.

The NSW Transport Workers Union who is supposed to represent the taxi drivers said during the proceedings via their lawyer, Adam Hatcher, "we reserve the right to oppose at a later date" and the TWU allowed to have passed a change to the Determination by transferring the cost of fuel and wash to those bailee drivers, contrary to Case and Statute Law.

The good CC Connor who heard the matter mentioned above found the opportunity and then he keenly passed the responsibility of gas and wash to the bailee taxi drivers without any compensation whatsoever to them. He did so despite strenuous objections made to him by myself and other drivers.

The net impact is the weaker party in the chain is carrying the burden while taxi bosses and non active plate investors etc. are laughing all the way to the bank contrary to the public and workers interest. Not long after the TWU lawyer Adam Hatcher found a chamber at the higher end of the town and became a Barrister! The then NSW TWU boss (Secretary) Steve Hutchins became the president of the NSW Labor Party and eventually a Senator after gaining the number one or first selection on the Senate ballot paper.

For your kind information I am appending some interesting discussions amongst taxi industry activists below.

I therefore would like to request you to open an investigation on why at the time and even to this day:

1. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer ignored bailee taxi drivers requests?

2. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer compromised bailee taxi drivers welfare and interest?

3. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer conspired to wrongfully manipulate the Granville Strike mentioned above?

4. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer frog marched mock members (from the Granville strike and many of whom confessed the illegalities and wrongful actions to me later) to the NSW IRC mentioned above to misrepresent bailee drivers in general?

5. NSW TWU leaders and their then lawyer never made any application to oppose the unlawful arrangement of the payment for fuel and wash as they promised to CC Connor in NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993?

6. Did the NSW TWU leaders and lawyer obtain any benefit out of such a compromise?

7. Why did CC Connor allow this ugly and blatant deal to go ahead without any examination?

8. Did CC Connor gain any benefit for his action and inaction in taxi matters in front of him?

9. Why did CC Connor refuse to accept a labor component in his decision?

With thanks

Sincerely Yours

Faruque Ahmed